Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '20 at 22:58
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Memory 82.2 1-Core 122 2-Core 248 83% 151 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 873 81% 676 Pts	64-Core 1,311 81% 1,311 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Sapphire(1DA2 E411) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.4% Average	Lighting 15 Reflection 9.69 Parallax 262 12% 95.7 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 140 Splatting 160 116% 138 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB 30,264 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 398GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 327 207 133 130 189 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.6% Average	Read 235 Write 104 Mixed 88.8 SusWrite 234 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 20.2 4K Mixed 11.7 54% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 13.8 DQ Write 14.7 DQ Mixed 14.3 11% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 102%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB 4,700 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: FJ1M SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 156 158 158 160 160 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Read 150 Write 165 Mixed 91.7 SusWrite 158 104% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.8 223% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x8GB 30,532 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	MC Read 39.4 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 31.2 99% 34.7 GB/s	SC Read 25.9 SC Write 37.8 SC Mixed 29.5 89% 31.1 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	424x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,069

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16