| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Dell Precision M6400 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0D138P |
| Memory | 6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090630 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | May 23 '20 at 22:52 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300-$172
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
50.7%
Above average
|
43% 63.5 Pts
|
19% 142 Pts
|
9% 140 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 372.70
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.3%
Above average
|
53% 65.2 fps
|
55% 66.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 220 223 229 229 229 MB/s
|
59.1%
Above average
|
52% 230 MB/s
|
89% 28.1 MB/s
|
138% 183 MB/s
|
|
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
117GB free
Firmware: JA0OA590
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 53 53 53 53 MB/s
|
30.5%
Below average
|
33% 45.6 MB/s
|
100% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.4%
Very poor
|
17% 5.9 GB/s
|
16% 5.43 GB/s
|
47% 85.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision M6400 Builds (Compare 61 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Precision M6400
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Extreme Q9300Intel $172Bench 46%, 660 samples | 14x |
| Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 11x |
| Core2 Duo T9550Intel $199Bench 39%, 1,427 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro FX 2700MNvidiaBench 3%, 788 samples | 30x |
| Quadro FX 3700MNvidiaBench 6%, 383 samples | 20x |
| FirePro M7740ATIBench 7%, 225 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 28% - Poor | Total price: $365 |