Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9700P APU (2016 M.BR) 5,770 User benchmarks, average bench 34% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Memory 67.3 1-Core 38.4 2-Core 84.8 41% 63.5 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 118 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 13D0) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	4.42% Terrible	Lighting 5.63 Reflection 7.46 Parallax 7.06 5% 6.72 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 5.33 Splatting 5.83 4% 4.86 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.42% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 386 Write 343 Mixed 301 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 57.7 4K Mixed 37.3 124% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 215 158% 208 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung K4A8G085WB-BCPB 12GB 409 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 2400, 2133 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 8 23% 8.17 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 6.6 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	57x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	57x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 6,884 samples	28x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	3x

RAM
K4A8G085WB-BCPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 22%, 816 samples	27x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 4,400 samples	21x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 12GBHynixBench 22%, 500 samples	18x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16