| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Latitude E6400 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0TN284 |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130604 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 23 '20 at 16:12 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 45% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.9%
Average
|
40% 57 Pts
|
8% 62.2 Pts
|
5% 73.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro NVS 160M
Dell(1028 0233) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.44
|
0.57%
Terrible
|
0% 0.78 fps
|
1% 0.84 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
18.8%
Very poor
|
17% 5.83 GB/s
|
15% 5.2 GB/s
|
43% 93.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Latitude E6400 Builds (Compare 58 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Latitude E6400
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples | 14x |
| Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 13x |
| Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro NVS 160MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,458 samples | 52x |
| Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples | 5x |
| NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M(pe64)Bench 0%, 1 sample | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $42 |