Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics40.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '20 at 13:56
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$345
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 150
2-Core 286
100% 177 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 1,140
105% 852 Pts
64-Core 1,145
77% 1,145 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
40.5% Average
Lighting 169
Reflection 143
Parallax 152
44% 155 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 151
Splatting 114
40% 120 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 43%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$180
529GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 753 1217 1292 1307 1260 1249 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,224
Write 1,300
Mixed 1,043
SusWrite 1,180
268% 1,187 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 98.4
4K Mixed 68.1
221% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 880
DQ Write 729
DQ Mixed 801
601% 803 MB/s
Poor: 190%
This bench: 226%
Great: 357%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$140
173GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 453 470 477 469 453 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 390
Mixed 347
SusWrite 436
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 45.4
148% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 312
234% 313 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$90
646GB free
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 173 172 174 173 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 172
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.3
410% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 30.2
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 28.7
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 126%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 2,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $652
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $345Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback