Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 23 '20 at 12:54
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 925
82% 696 Pts
64-Core 922
57% 922 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Lighting 71.6
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 99.2
58% 80.3 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 57.3
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
493GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1575 1548 1584 1602 1509 1586 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,500
Write 1,864
Mixed 1,713
SusWrite 1,567
428% 1,911 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 55.9
191% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,212
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 296
312% 549 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 285%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
153GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1439 1255 1168 1167 1159 1061 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,613
Write 1,852
Mixed 1,773
SusWrite 1208
416% 1,861 MB/s
4K Read 63.9
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 55.6
194% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,284
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 242
295% 553 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 270%
Great: 372%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 415 407 410 429 405 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 471
Write 405
Mixed 401
SusWrite 415
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 32.4
108% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 81.3
DQ Mixed 147
130% 203 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 125%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
793GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 161 159 162 154 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 160
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 159
96% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 58 33 26 99 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 108
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 56.1
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.6
257% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 29.1
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 25.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $877
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback