Lenovo 80E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 80E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B2
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160804
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 23 '20 at 11:51
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 35.9
2-Core 66.3
35% 53.7 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 119
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 3.53
2% 3.77 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 3.61
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 351 339 336 347 345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 400
Write 345
Mixed 350
SusWrite 343
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 34.4
110% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 138
104% 138 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU5-GNL-F 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
20% Very poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 7.1
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.4
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E1 Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback