| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 95.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100824 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 23 '20 at 06:57 |
| Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61%
Good
|
51% 77 Pts
|
27% 217 Pts
|
16% 265 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
95.1%
Outstanding
|
92% 118 fps
|
101% 128 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 347 345 356 358 361 MB/s
|
70.7%
Very good
|
78% 347 MB/s
|
104% 36 MB/s
|
40% 55.9 MB/s
|
|
|
51% 231 MB/s
|
112% 39.8 MB/s
|
36% 54.6 MB/s
| |
|
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
13GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.2 MB/s
|
21.5%
Poor
|
16% 21.7 MB/s
|
141% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 800 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.7%
Below average
|
32% 11.4 GB/s
|
22% 7.83 GB/s
|
58% 68.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 234 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 48x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 40x |
| Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 31x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples | 20x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
| HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $268 |