Gigabyte GA-H110-D3A-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110-D3A
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110-D3A-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170629
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '20 at 05:04
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	52%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Memory 73.6 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 186 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 318 38% 291 Pts	64-Core 301 19% 301 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6162) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Lighting 69.3 Reflection 69.4 Parallax 67.4 56% 68.7 fps	MRender 70.8 Gravity 68.3 Splatting 72.3 58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 429GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 319 256 226 220 303 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 426 Write 377 Mixed 183 SusWrite 251 69% 309 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 22 94% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 91.4 122% 224 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 126%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 7,666 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2TB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 24 27 20 20 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 95 Write 40.2 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 26.6 37% 49.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 61% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42 131,007 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	53% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 16.7 54% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 15.1 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 93.3 43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110-D3A-CF Builds (Compare 1,336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110-D3A-CF

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	192x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	112x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	108x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	146x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	98x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	88x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	59x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	45x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	31x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	25x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	23x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16