Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A33
Motherboard	MSI X370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A33) (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191129
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	May 23 '20 at 03:34
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 78.6 1-Core 117 2-Core 234 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 439 8-Core 718 71% 579 Pts	64-Core 928 57% 928 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3417) CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	20.6% Poor	Lighting 4.73 Reflection 8.12 Parallax 4.69 4% 5.85 fps	MRender 69.5 Gravity 70.9 Splatting 57.4 53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 220 219 219 219 218 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 475 Mixed 388 SusWrite 245 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 88.4 4K Mixed 53.3 176% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 363 273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 19GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 176 100 90 60 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 475 Write 269 Mixed 274 SusWrite 126 63% 286 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 26.1 100% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 97.9 DQ Mixed 150 123% 180 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 86%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1.5TB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 196 87 43 147 214 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	99.3% Outstanding	Read 206 Write 54.7 Mixed 98.3 SusWrite 139 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 0.9 295% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 2x8GB 16,539 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 33.5 98% 34.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.5 SC Write 34.9 SC Mixed 27.9 82% 28.8 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX 2x8GBCorsairBench 74%, 8,261 samples	6x

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $352

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16