Asus Zephyrus M GU502GV_GU502GV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
14 days ago, 14 days ago.
SystemAsus Zephyrus M GU502GV_GU502GV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU502GV
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190925
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 23 '20 at 02:33
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 238
88% 151 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 750
77% 608 Pts
64-Core 938
63% 938 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1881) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 258
Parallax 26.4
5% 102 fps
MRender 16.8
Gravity 22
Splatting 37.7
6% 25.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel Optane+954G 1TB
536GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 534 543 572 1039 721 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 104%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A2G43AB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 62
65% 62 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 45%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Zephyrus M GU502GV_GU502GV Builds (Compare 325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

System: Asus Zephyrus M GU502GV_GU502GV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $110
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $54
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback