Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '20 at 22:50
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 97.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 610
65% 520 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.92
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.5% Very good
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 108
Parallax 101
80% 103 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 94.9
Splatting 96
78% 95.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 179 189 190 191 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 359
Write 346
Mixed 334
SusWrite 182
69% 305 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 46.5
152% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 208
164% 228 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
287GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 180 191 193 192 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 359
Write 350
Mixed 322
SusWrite 184
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 49.4
162% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 232
168% 220 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
746GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 138 137 136 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 84.9
Write 84.1
Mixed 53
SusWrite 136
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 84%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
120GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 148 151 148 150 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 96.9
Write 120
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 150
71% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 110%
WD WD7502AAEX-00Y9A0 750GB
110GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 80 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 89.9
Mixed 90
SusWrite 78.7
68% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 22.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 23.5
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 49.1
82% 49.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,214
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback