Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '20 at 18:58
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	51%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217 8,137 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 154 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 384 41% 328 Pts	64-Core 474 29% 474 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Dell(1028 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2007 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56% Above average	Lighting 70.1 Reflection 68.3 Parallax 67 57% 68.4 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 62.5 Splatting 64.5 54% 66 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79 17,432 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 004C SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 221 231 213 221 230 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Read 409 Write 351 Mixed 330 SusWrite 221 74% 328 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 80.2 4K Mixed 46.9 152% 53.3 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 289 DQ Mixed 184 168% 255 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 117%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 100 96 95 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 112 Write 79.7 Mixed 53.9 SusWrite 98.3 63% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DHX DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	46.4% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.1 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H87M-D3H Builds (Compare 615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	160x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	83x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	70x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	36x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	20x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	18x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	13x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $118

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16