Grupo@sitre ALDA+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGrupo@sitre ALDA+  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P5B-VM DO
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '17 at 15:56
Run Duration492 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 6420-$190
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
16.3% Very poor
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 63.4
23% 48.3 Pts
4-Core 63.8
8-Core 66.9
9% 65.3 Pts
64-Core 65
4% 65 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 17%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD WD1600YS-01SHB1 165GB-$90
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20.06C06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 50.9
Write 52.5
Mixed 28.5
32% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.26
66% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 35%
Verbatim STORE N GO 64GB
35GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Read 6.93
Write 2.38
Mixed 2.87
4% 4.06 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 21%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ALDA+ Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Grupo@sitre ALDA+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $89
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $159Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $338Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback