Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '20 at 14:50
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 59%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 111
2-Core 221
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 654
66% 537 Pts
64-Core 1,159
72% 1,159 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
143% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 208
Parallax 261
145% 216 fps
MRender 269
Gravity 225
Splatting 148
168% 214 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 143%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 996
Write 153
Mixed 214
97% 454 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 30.9
121% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 753
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 209
209% 356 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
200GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 443 447 453 445 442 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 347
Write 362
Mixed 265
SusWrite 435
80% 352 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 38.2
136% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
200GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 444 447 453 446 442 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 384
Write 342
Mixed 306
SusWrite 436
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 38
129% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST10000NE0004-1ZF101 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 171 171 170 169 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 112
Mixed 81
SusWrite 170
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.2
340% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M4B3000C15 CMK32GX4M4C3000C15 CMK32GX4M4B3000C15 CMK32GX4M4C3000C15 CMK32GX4M4B3000C15 CMK32GX4M4C3000C15 CMK32GX4M4B3000C15 CMK32GX4M4C3000C15 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
106% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 42.8
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 21.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback