HP 550-153w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 550-153w  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B2C
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150904
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateMay 22 '20 at 05:15
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 138
54% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 192
28% 204 Pts
64-Core 235
15% 235 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.9% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 27.7
21% 28.4 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 29
23% 27.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
131GB free
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 185 81 81 78 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 368
Write 211
Mixed 240
SusWrite 144
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 15.2
60% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 29.2
34% 61.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
548GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 110 114 114 110 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
73% Very good
Read 144
Write 114
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 111
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
99% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73%
Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
0GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 3 2.4 3 1.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 19.2
Write 0.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.3
5% 6.18 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.2
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-153w Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-153w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback