| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181122 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 21 '20 at 23:20 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.2%
Above average
|
61% 108 Pts
|
47% 381 Pts
|
24% 396 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
XFX(1682 956D) 2GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
13% 22.1 fps
|
23% 27.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 136 132 136 140 147 MB/s
|
76.3%
Very good
|
95% 128 MB/s
|
228% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
58.3%
Above average
|
63% 22 GB/s
|
38% 13.2 GB/s
|
33% 122 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,976 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 865x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 714x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 542x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 454x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 423x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 401x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $323 |