Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	39.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	2.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 21 '20 at 19:43
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 121 2-Core 212 79% 139 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 663 63% 523 Pts	64-Core 862 53% 862 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C304) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.3% Below average	Lighting 50.5 Reflection 104 Parallax 93.7 41% 82.6 fps	MRender 34.1 Gravity 52.9 Splatting 43.3 36% 43.5 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 432GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 417 398 374 397 379 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 405 Write 385 Mixed 373 SusWrite 394 88% 389 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 32.7 110% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 351 264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 3TB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 434 409 390 408 408 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 435 Write 405 Mixed 396 SusWrite 409 93% 411 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 34.9 122% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 353 264% 351 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 133%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 14GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	6.82% Terrible	Read 28 Write 16.7 Mixed 10.8 SusWrite 10.6 20% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.82% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 14,300 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 17.6 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.4 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 150%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 139%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,503x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,315x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	1,120x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,345x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	1,040x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	802x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	738x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	583x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	522x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,095

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16