Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Toshiba Satellite C645 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 21 '20 at 05:10
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Memory 55.1 1-Core 22.5 2-Core 40.4 28% 39.3 Pts	4-Core 56.4 8-Core 53.1 7% 54.8 Pts	64-Core 56.1 4% 56.1 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FDF2) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.51% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.84 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.51% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 45 13 50 55 40 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.2% Poor	Read 200 Write 97 Mixed 128 SusWrite 36.5 26% 115 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 14.5 50% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 17 DQ Write 44.9 DQ Mixed 20 18% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 85%
Toshiba MK3265GSXN 320GB 2,380 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 285GB free Firmware: GH101M SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 71 56 78 76 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 86.7 Write 83 Mixed 50 SusWrite 69.4 53% 72.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 48%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB 195 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 7 Mixed 2.8 5% 4.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16JSF51264HZ-1G4D1 M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 8.6 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.9 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium P6100IntelBench 35%, 6,283 samples	19x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	7x
Pentium P6200IntelBench 36%, 8,041 samples	5x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	36x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	5x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	3x

SSD
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	7x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG M471B5773CHS-CH9 4GBUnknownBench 22%, 21 samples	7x
M471B5273CH0-CF8 1x4GBSamsungBench 19%, 426 samples	3x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 4GBUnknownBench 21%, 23 samples	3x

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $14

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16