Alienware Aurora R7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAlienware Aurora R7  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0VDT73
Memory4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 21 '20 at 04:53
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 218
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 689
67% 548 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Dell(1028 3600) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.50
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 89.3
Reflection 174
Parallax 174
73% 146 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 161
Splatting 101
99% 123 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AADA4101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,528
Write 398
Mixed 384
166% 770 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 43.9
166% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 427
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 289
242% 351 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 193%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
19GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 493
Write 456
Mixed 395
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 46.5
146% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 353
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 187 191 190 191 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 136
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 188
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 40 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 35.5
Write 37.3
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 40.4
27% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.4
154% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
68.4% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 21.8
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 20.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R7 Builds (Compare 5,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Alienware Aurora R7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $633
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback