Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory	6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140609
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	May 21 '20 at 02:30
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 193 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 365 50% 371 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740 30,433 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 864E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.01 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.5% Terrible	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 0.08 Parallax 0.09 0% 0.07 fps	MRender 7.95 Gravity 9.03 Splatting 9.43 7% 8.81 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.5% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 1,997 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0604 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 119 122 117 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 150 Write 144 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 120 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 0.8 8% 3.97 MB/s	DQ Read 1.3 DQ Write 7.6 DQ Mixed 2.1 2% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 18%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB 1,326 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4TB free (System drive) Firmware: APGNW7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 168 176 178 178 168 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 176 Mixed 56 SusWrite 174 104% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 190% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 121%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 161 161 161 158 159 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 143 Write 149 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 160 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 108%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51 6,566 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 72 73 73 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 68 Write 64.8 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 72.9 51% 69 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 65%
Hitachi HDS5C3030BLE 3TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 135GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 143 140 141 142 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 152 Write 147 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 142 156% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%
Seagate FreeAgent 1.5TB 684 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 979GB free, PID 3001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 30 29 32 32 30 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 31 Write 31.5 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 31 40% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 20%
SDXC Card 64GB 12,175 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 60GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 22 Write 18.3 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 18.1 26% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.8 114% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB 3,029 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 18.3 58% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 17.7 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	413x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	394x
Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples	350x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	162x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	155x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	142x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	44x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	217x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	214x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	111x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $324

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16