Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 21 '20 at 00:17
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 268
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 1017
90% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,401
87% 1,401 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
EVGA(3842 6284) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 131
Parallax 114
107% 126 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 125
Splatting 99.2
89% 110 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
670GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 475
Mixed 400
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 47.1
164% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 352
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
147GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 496
Write 468
Mixed 359
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 57.3
187% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
295GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 496
Write 470
Mixed 450
105% 472 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 57.7
191% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 355
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
97GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 401
Write 398
Mixed 352
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 27.5
90% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 142
104% 137 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 97%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
113GB free
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,011
Write 1,396
Mixed 952
320% 1,453 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 57.9
212% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 944
DQ Write 408
DQ Mixed 458
397% 603 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 283%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
714GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 90.7
Mixed 73.3
68% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 182
Write 148
Mixed 100
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
218% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC4C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,105
Write 16.5
Mixed 76.8
1,003% 1,399 MB/s
4K Read 811
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.6
34,108% 272 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 49.2
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 47.2
127% 44.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 22
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 115%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $1,193
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback