To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071101
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	May 20 '20 at 16:22
Run Duration	286 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	69%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 2140-$45 1,317 User benchmarks, average bench 31% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Memory 51.9 1-Core 28.3 2-Core 56.5 30% 45.6 Pts	4-Core 57.8 8-Core 59.3 8% 58.5 Pts	64-Core 54.1 3% 54.1 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 415GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 53 50 59 59 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 83.8 Write 61.2 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 52.1 45% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 142% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 70%
Maxtor 6 Y160P0 164GB 404 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 48GB free Firmware: YAR41BW0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	24.4% Poor	Read 41.1 Write 48.7 Mixed 34.6 SusWrite 43.3 31% 41.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 32%
Seagate ST380811AS 80GB-$99 2,717 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 41GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 53 55 59 59 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	24.2% Poor	Read 30.2 Write 19.1 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 54 24% 31.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 40%
Philips USB Flash Drive 64GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 16GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 4.8 2.4 9.2 7.2 5.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	4.23% Terrible	Read 18.4 Write 24.1 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 4.9 15% 12.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 11% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.23% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.86% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.7 7% 2.37 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.86% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	615x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	102x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16