Asus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 20 '20 at 06:21
Run Duration	250 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Memory 95.5 1-Core 118 2-Core 232 85% 148 Pts	4-Core 464 8-Core 753 75% 609 Pts	64-Core 901 56% 901 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 853F) CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.59 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.6% Average	Lighting 59.4 Reflection 66.4 Parallax 58.3 48% 61.4 fps	MRender 72 Gravity 57.4 Splatting 53.3 49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2304 779 779 783 780 773 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	319% Outstanding	Read 2,629 Write 2,448 Mixed 1,904 SusWrite 1,033 448% 2,004 MB/s	4K Read 71.2 4K Write 174 4K Mixed 97.6 325% 114 MB/s	DQ Read 1,193 DQ Write 1,032 DQ Mixed 1,104 830% 1,110 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 319% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 50GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 495 495 495 491 231 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 492 Mixed 416 SusWrite 450 105% 465 MB/s	4K Read 47.2 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 65.4 223% 80.4 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 363 273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 134%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 12GB free Firmware: X2306RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 498 Write 276 Mixed 215 72% 330 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 38.8 158% 60.5 MB/s	DQ Read 316 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 126 129% 212 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 737GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 142 143 143 144 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 138 Write 117 Mixed 77.6 SusWrite 141 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 114%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 413GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 117 117 118 117 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 131 Write 127 Mixed 64 SusWrite 116 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 74%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 10GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 9.1 8.9 9.2 8.5 9.3 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 38.1 Write 8.2 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 8 18% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 3.4 229% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 6,868 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	MC Read 35.8 MC Write 37.6 MC Mixed 26.2 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 41.6 SC Mixed 30.8 89% 31 GB/s	Latency 55.5 72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING Builds (Compare 4,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING - $170

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	2,054x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	722x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	400x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	481x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	423x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	271x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	184x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	137x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	176x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	127x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	125x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $927

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16