Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus EX-A320M-GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 19 '20 at 14:35
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9800E APU (2016 M.BR) 768 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Memory 66.5 1-Core 69.5 2-Core 126 52% 87.2 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 205 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 8719) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.30.28 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	7.9% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 13.8 8% 11.3 fps	MRender 7.29 Gravity 11.6 Splatting 9.78 8% 9.57 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.9% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30 20,238 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 229 71 75 76 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 400 Write 303 Mixed 292 SusWrite 128 63% 281 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 26.6 98% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 163 139% 203 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 91%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79 15,506 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 191GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 83 82 81 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 85.2 Write 85.1 Mixed 40 SusWrite 81 53% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 63%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 16,068 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	5.97% Terrible	Read 22.8 Write 9.3 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 10.6 14% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.97% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.9% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 13.3 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 9.3 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	165x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	156x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	95x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	93x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	91x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	60x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	54x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	34x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples	46x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	33x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $241

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16