Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X571GD
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 19 '20 at 05:09
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 209
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 524
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Asus(1043 12FF) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3191
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 19.5
17% 20.7 fps
MRender 19.3
Gravity 26.7
Splatting 22.3
19% 22.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 358 365 356 364 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 793
Write 588
Mixed 387
SusWrite 364
119% 533 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 28.7
138% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 510
DQ Write 645
DQ Mixed 418
360% 524 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 121%
Great: 153%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
874GB free
Firmware: JU0C1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 44 31 51 16 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.89% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 13
Mixed 1.2
SusWrite 29.4
8% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 8.89%
Great: 79%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
816GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 67 70 86 82 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 81.6
Write 59.6
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 75.8
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-026.A00G 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 19.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 21.4
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD Builds (Compare 316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback