Acer Aspire TC-705

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-705  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-705
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '20 at 02:07
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$320
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 590
66% 508 Pts
64-Core 594
40% 594 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
PNY(196E 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 14.5
3% 12.1 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 14
3% 11.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 24 22 15 22 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 84.3
Write 93
Mixed 65
SusWrite 27.5
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
664GB free
Firmware: 0739
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 10 11 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 36
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 10.4
21% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.5
190% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 87%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
185GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 12 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 36.8
Write 34.6
Mixed 32
SusWrite 12.2
38% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.2
192% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 83%
WD Elements 2TB
926GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 12 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 38.1
Write 34.9
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 12.2
36% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 169 165 164 170 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
79% Very good
Read 181
Write 187
Mixed 111
SusWrite 169
218% 162 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 79%
Great: 84%
Staples Relay UFD 16GB
6GB free, PID 5202
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.7 4.1 5 5 4.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
8.04% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 11.2
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 4
13% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
78% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.04%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 13
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aspire TC-705 Builds (Compare 1,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Acer Aspire TC-705

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $465
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $365Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback