Performance Results


Gaming 101% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA530
Memory	23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190606
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 19 '20 at 01:50
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Memory 89.2 1-Core 130 2-Core 255 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 503 8-Core 717 76% 610 Pts	64-Core 886 55% 886 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Asus(1043 8709) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	108% Outstanding	Lighting 138 Reflection 130 Parallax 138 112% 135 fps	MRender 162 Gravity 128 Splatting 104 104% 131 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1039 858 844 802 783 755 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 1,750 Write 1582 Mixed 1,294 SusWrite 847 306% 1,368 MB/s	4K Read 59 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 75.7 246% 82.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1316 DQ Write 881 DQ Mixed 1,029 786% 1,075 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 410%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB 2,362 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 390GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.5% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 41.2 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 41.6 9% 39.9 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 15.1 4K Mixed 13.2 43% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 24.3 DQ Write 25.3 DQ Mixed 24.8 19% 24.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C8FBD1 2x16GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	87% Excellent	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 34.3 MC Mixed 27 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 25.8 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,021x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	443x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	273x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	272x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	156x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	114x
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	61x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	762x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	31x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 81%, 6,948 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16