PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 8.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P6X58D-E (all builds) |
Memory | 15.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1804 x 1014 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110510 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | May 18 '20 at 09:07 |
Run Duration | 181 Seconds |
Run User | NZL-User |
Background CPU | 55% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
XFX(1682 2391) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 340.52
|
8.82%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 76 53 54 MB/s
|
26.2%
Poor
|
|||
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
159GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 78 77 90 92 MB/s
|
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
456GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 126 130 132 136 MB/s
|
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 104 101 109 MB/s
|
60.7%
Good
|
|||
CT500MX5 00SSD1 500GB
241GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 22 22 22 MB/s
|
15.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB
|
22%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 496x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 198x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 145x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 74x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 74x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 67x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $288 |