Toshiba Satellite C665

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Toshiba Satellite C665 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 18 '20 at 05:35
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2350M 24,896 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	55.3% Above average	Memory 84.7 1-Core 60.9 2-Core 117 55% 87.5 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 153 20% 153 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M 3,213 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FCE2) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.44 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.28% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.77 Parallax 0.53 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 3.33 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 2.09 2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.28% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 218 190 123 110 111 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.2% Above average	Read 242 Write 229 Mixed 213 SusWrite 162 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 28.9 95% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 32.4 71% 145 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 134%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 24.5 Write 19.8 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 10.3 24% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB 131 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 996GB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 20.8 Write 19 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 10.3 24% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 696 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2.5TB free, PID 331a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 10 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 24.5 Write 20 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 10.4 22% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.5 127% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 316 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1TB free, PID 3321 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 20 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 10.3 25% 19.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GB 13,596 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.4 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 13.2 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C665 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C665

CPU
Core i3-2330MIntel $150Bench 47%, 20,066 samples	5x
Pentium P6200IntelBench 36%, 8,041 samples	2x
Core i3-2310MIntel $80Bench 46%, 25,542 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples	6x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	5x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	3x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x

RAM
TSB1066D3S7ELF/2G 1x2GBUnknownBench 19%, 105 samples	5x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	3x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16