Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	May 18 '20 at 02:23
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 69.9 1-Core 149 2-Core 294 90% 171 Pts	4-Core 556 8-Core 978 93% 767 Pts	64-Core 1437 89% 1437 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56% Above average	Lighting 67.9 Reflection 74.6 Parallax 71.4 55% 71.3 fps	MRender 69.7 Gravity 69.1 Splatting 71 57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 806GB free (System drive) Firmware: 411030WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 391 424 431 436 441 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 416 Mixed 360 SusWrite 411 94% 416 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 43.8 143% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 191 146% 197 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 117%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 41GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 39 39 39 40 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 431 Write 56.3 Mixed 82.8 SusWrite 39.7 33% 152 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 31.5 113% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 53.9 DQ Mixed 83.1 75% 118 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 62GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 81 81 81 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 104 Write 99 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 80.7 64% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 67GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 108 109 108 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 119 Write 126 Mixed 74 SusWrite 108 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 163GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 102 102 102 102 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 165 Write 144 Mixed 85 SusWrite 100 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 216 216 218 216 220 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 153 Write 172 Mixed 70.7 SusWrite 216 111% 153 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 213 211 209 213 212 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 154 Write 186 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 210 113% 156 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.1 226% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.6% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 13.5 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 13 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	869x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	515x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	403x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $937

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16