Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Battleship	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z10PE-D16 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory	121.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190612
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 18 '20 at 00:21
Run Duration	280 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel 0000 69 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Memory 75 1-Core 75.5 2-Core 130 57% 93.6 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 597 53% 449 Pts	64-Core 1,897 117% 1,897 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8675) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 170 Parallax 216 101% 170 fps	MRender 231 Gravity 186 Splatting 125 142% 181 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MS1PC5ED3ORA3.2T 3TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 258% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: KPYABR3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1676 1680 1695 1672 1653 1684 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	256% Outstanding	Read 1,752 Write 1,669 Mixed 1,073 SusWrite 1,676 347% 1,543 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 51.9 184% 68.5 MB/s	DQ Read 664 DQ Write 534 DQ Mixed 602 450% 600 MB/s
Poor: 171% ↑ This bench: 256% Great: 312%
Samsung PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 1TB 2,610 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 819GB free Firmware: BXV76D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 578 579 580 578 577 575 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	Read 684 Write 553 Mixed 446 SusWrite 578 127% 565 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 41.7 154% 55.3 MB/s	DQ Read 713 DQ Write 614 DQ Mixed 657 494% 661 MB/s
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 201%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 612GB free Firmware: CC4C SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 156 171 160 160 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 132 Mixed 81.3 SusWrite 163 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 271GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 78 80 80 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 73.7 Write 55.3 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 79.7 45% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 67%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 464GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 64 66 66 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 60 Write 55.8 Mixed 52 SusWrite 65.4 43% 58.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 63%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 386GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 79 81 83 83 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 128 Write 125 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 81.3 72% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 82%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 825GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 212 219 220 218 214 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 173 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 214 110% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 2.1 380% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 112%
JMicron Generic 1TB 376 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 71GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Read 41.5 Write 41.5 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 42.3 56% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 222%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GB 591 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	MC Read 54.8 MC Write 47.3 MC Mixed 45 140% 49 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 14.5 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 90.4 44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 72%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31stBench 66%, 886 samples	24x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples	22x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	17x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	26x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	22x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	18x

SSD
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)WD $74Bench 277%, 114,373 samples	11x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	26x
HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 4x31.8GBHynixBench 85%, 82 samples	11x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $348

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16