Performance Results


Gaming 128% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 112% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270MX-Gaming5 (all builds)
Memory	26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161124
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 17 '20 at 17:08
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Memory 80.4 1-Core 141 2-Core 277 90% 166 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 760 77% 622 Pts	64-Core 734 46% 734 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% MSI(1462 3715) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	153% Outstanding	Lighting 211 Reflection 218 Parallax 229 172% 219 fps	MRender 243 Gravity 210 Splatting 133 153% 195 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 474 178 178 173 168 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 471 Mixed 431 SusWrite 273 94% 417 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 59.2 197% 70.3 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 347 265% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%
Hitachi HCS721010CLA332 1TB 407 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 348GB free Firmware: A3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 115 117 118 116 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 116 Write 107 Mixed 55.2 SusWrite 116 72% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 77%
Hitachi HCS721010CLA332 1TB 407 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 512GB free Firmware: A3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 92 94 94 94 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 118 Write 116 Mixed 59 SusWrite 92.3 71% 96.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3000C15-8GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3000C15-8GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 32GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.9% Very good	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 22.4 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 23.5 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	11x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	12x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	9x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	8x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $500

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16