Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	17.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150723
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 17 '20 at 04:36
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$62 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 86.9 2-Core 164 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 239 32% 237 Pts	64-Core 278 17% 278 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: B1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 82 38 11 57 9.9 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.8% Very poor	Read 111 Write 70.8 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 39.5 15% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 14.8 4K Mixed 8.5 34% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 10.7 DQ Write 12.3 DQ Mixed 11.2 8% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 100%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB 23,667 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 154GB free Firmware: CA14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 58 60 56 56 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 103 Write 101 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 56.4 57% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 61%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 39GB free Firmware: 3E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 70 70 67 68 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 90 Write 90.8 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 69.2 57% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 60%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 160GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 70 69 69 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 66.2 Write 65.5 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 69.5 49% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 2x4GB 3,493 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.8% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 13.6 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 12.1 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-VG4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	249x
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	142x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	119x

GPU
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	130x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	119x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	71x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	48x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	35x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	26x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	25x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16