MSI Z68A-GD80 (B3) (MS-7672)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7672
MotherboardMSI Z68A-GD80 (B3) (MS-7672)  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 23:20
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 195
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 496
52% 416 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.7% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 65
Parallax 73.2
46% 65 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 53.7
48% 58.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 286 265 281 257 206 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 468
Mixed 387
SusWrite 279
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 42.5
154% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 366
263% 336 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 124%
Gloway S TK720GS3-S7 719GB
266GB free
Firmware: R042
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 156 157 155 145 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 340
Write 136
Mixed 183
SusWrite 132
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 17
72% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 24.9
44% 84.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 64%
Londisk 960GB 960GB
275GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 242 244 244 241 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.6% Very good
Read 244
Write 231
Mixed 235
SusWrite 241
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 34.3
123% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 102
104% 169 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 124%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 134 136 137 137 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 90.2
Write 78.3
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 134
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
321GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 91 95 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 89.3
Write 66
Mixed 77
SusWrite 91.8
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 89D0 KHX1866C10D3/8G 89D0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68A-GD80 (B3) (MS-7672) Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI Z68A-GD80 (B3) (MS-7672)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $624
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback