PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds) |
Memory | 7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180424 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | May 16 '20 at 22:12 |
Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
58.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 24 27 28 17 MB/s
|
20.9%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
413GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 102 99 101 104 MB/s
|
63.6%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70EB0- 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
44.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 109x |
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 48x |
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 44x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 36x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 27x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $130 |