CSL R'Evolve C15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCSL R'Evolve C15  (all builds)
MotherboardWeibu rev1.0
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 09:34
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 92%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
23.8% Poor
Memory 25.6
1-Core 32.6
2-Core 61.9
23% 40 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 131
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 0.09
1% 1.15 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.83
2% 1.72 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0B- 240GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 24 2.7 39 31 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 229
Write 126
Mixed 140
SusWrite 69
105% 141 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 10.1
1,626% 8.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
26% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 8.1
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 282
14% 282 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback