Asus TUF Gaming FX705GD_FX705GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705GD_FX705GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705GD
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180921
Uptime11 Days
Run DateMay 15 '20 at 18:38
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 765
77% 628 Pts
64-Core 1,006
62% 1,006 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1441) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 31
27% 29.6 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 22.5
24% 30 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 25%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1441) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.9% Terrible
Lighting 7.13
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 7.16
6% 13.2 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 6.57
Splatting 14.2
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.9%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$33
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1115D0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 512 376 487 145 466 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 1,331
Write 961
Mixed 472
SusWrite 373
174% 784 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 15.7
90% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 92.6
DQ Mixed 230
168% 228 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 112%
Great: 228%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 131 132 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 123
Write 119
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 133
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 27
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 26.4
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX705GD_FX705GD Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705GD_FX705GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback