PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 42.5 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160224 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | May 15 '20 at 13:26 |
Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
|
74.6%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
HP(103C 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 385.69
|
47.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZ7KM480 480GB
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 123 123 122 123 MB/s
|
36.7%
Below average
|
|||
Maxtor 6Y080M0 80GB
32GB free
Firmware: 11W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 44 46 47 47 47 MB/s
|
25.3%
Poor
|
|||
Maxtor 6Y080M0 80GB
70GB free
Firmware: 11W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 51 48 44 42 MB/s
|
30.3%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST380013AS 80GB-$75
74GB free
Firmware: 3.44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 55 54 54 MB/s
|
32.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 188x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 179x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 87x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 67x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |