Hp-pavilion FL414AA-AKB m9450cs

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion FL414AA-AKB m9450cs (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080905
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 15 '20 at 13:17
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49 19,990 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Memory 71.9 1-Core 33.1 2-Core 66.2 39% 57.1 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 128 16% 124 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 2203) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.96% Terrible	Lighting 2.57 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 2.16 2% 2.45 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 2.26 2% 2.08 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.96% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 527ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 95 97 94 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 168 Write 99.2 Mixed 154 SusWrite 93.2 29% 129 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 26.4 87% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 128 98% 133 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 73%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 83GB free Firmware: CR100-13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 53 52 52 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 47.8 Write 53.4 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 52.6 35% 47.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 2.7 9.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 32.6 Write 15.2 SusWrite 7.8 20% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB 4,300 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 288GB free, PID 61b3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 24 25 25 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Write 14.3 Mixed 5 SusWrite 23.4 23% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 100% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 4.3 14% 4.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 97 41% 97 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FL414AA-AKB m9450cs Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion FL414AA-AKB m9450cs

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	1x

SSD
PM830 128GBSamsungBench 61%, 13,767 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $49

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16