HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 15 '20 at 03:58
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 92 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 180 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 342 46% 344 Pts	64-Core 325 20% 325 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220 19,671 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 0715) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.44 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.51% Terrible	Lighting 2.87 Reflection 4.46 Parallax 1.12 2% 2.82 fps	MRender 5.33 Gravity 2.07 Splatting 3.26 3% 3.55 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.51% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40 18,782 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 557GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 80 104 99 115 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 115 Write 116 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 96.7 74% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 85%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 925GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 11 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 20.9 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 10.3 27% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 63%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 5GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 4.1 5.6 5 5.2 4.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	9.32% Terrible	Read 12.5 Write 3 Mixed 10 SusWrite 4.5 9% 7.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.4 157% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.32% Great: 13%
hp v245o 32GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 30GB free, PID ad07 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 6.3 4.9 3.4 5.1 6.3 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	4.77% Terrible	Read 19.2 Write 18.4 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 5 20% 14.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.77% Great: 8%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 8GB 811 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 1400 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.8 2.4 2.4 1.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	3.79% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 8 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 2.4 9% 7.65 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 9%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 824 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 240GB free, PID a00e Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 11 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 30 Write 21 Mixed 18.6 SusWrite 10.4 25% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 1x4GB 1,487 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	135x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	93x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	38x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	57x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	25x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	25x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	10x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	10x
HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 8GBHynixBench 46%, 25 samples	8x
HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 47%, 1,090 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $285

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16