Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130423
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 15 '20 at 02:59
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 142
59% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 369
38% 307 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 126
Parallax 141
106% 133 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 131
Splatting 103
109% 138 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 148 135 138 141 134 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.6% Average
Read 205
Write 217
Mixed 193
SusWrite 146
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 27.1
87% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 66.9
DQ Mixed 35.1
30% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 97%
Lacie P9233 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 9.9 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 24
Write 26.2
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 10
16% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.6
178% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 140 135 139 138 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 108
Write 117
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 136
68% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
205% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.8 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 26
Write 25.3
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 9.9
16% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.7
246% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 89%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 89 90 90 90 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 37.7
Write 85.3
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 88.6
45% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.3
189% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 87%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
848GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.4 9.4 9.3 9.4 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 22.7
Write 20.8
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 9.3
24% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 14.2
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 Builds (Compare 1,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $175
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback