Intel D865PERL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	19.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	INTEL_ D865PERL
Motherboard	Intel D865PERL (all builds)
Memory	1.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20040203
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 14 '20 at 23:25
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz 6,937 User benchmarks, average bench 29% J2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	30% Below average	Memory 54.5 1-Core 32.1 2-Core 36.4 30% 41 Pts	4-Core 35.3 8-Core 34.8 5% 35 Pts	64-Core 36.3 2% 36.3 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI RADEON 9600 Series Sapphire(174B 7C20) 128MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.23 Reflection 0.23 0% 0.23 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1210A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 86 14 20 6.5 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.7% Very poor	Read 121 Write 114 Mixed 112 SusWrite 41.5 22% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 0.3 44% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 21.8 DQ Write 4.2 DQ Mixed 0.3 4% 8.77 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 101%
Seagate ST3120026AS 120GB-$24 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 18GB free Firmware: 3.05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 35 35 35 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 26.9 Write 29.2 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 34.3 21% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 101% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 31%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB 1,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 480GB free, PID a0a4 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 18 19 18 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 23.9 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 17.7 31% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 18 19 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 21.5 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 17.6 30% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 1024, 512, 512 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.3% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 2 7% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 1.8 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.3% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Intel D865PERL

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)