Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170920
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMay 13 '20 at 18:20
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 77
1-Core 109
2-Core 198
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 771
68% 576 Pts
64-Core 961
60% 961 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 149
Parallax 138
106% 139 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 134
Splatting 108
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 238 250 250 251 248 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 421
Write 248
Mixed 259
SusWrite 246
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 28.1
109% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 188
157% 225 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 121%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
19GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 411
Write 402
Mixed 374
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 44.2
151% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 355
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
12GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 100 112 116 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 132
Write 129
Mixed 90
SusWrite 106
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 98 100 101 99 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 115
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 98
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 13.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 8.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $404
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback