Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Memory 28.6 1-Core 26 2-Core 49.3 21% 34.6 Pts	4-Core 55.5 8-Core 70.4 8% 63 Pts	64-Core 90.6 6% 90.6 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 17.3 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 15.6 14% 15.7 fps	MRender 21.3 Gravity 19 Splatting 13.4 14% 17.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 501ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 762 Write 25.2 Mixed 50.5 58% 279 MB/s	4K Read 79.2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.9 125% 28 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 83%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 186GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 67 61 67 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 72.1 Write 68.3 Mixed 45 SusWrite 64.3 46% 62.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 42GB 3,060 User benchmarks, average bench 23% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024, 36864 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 3.7 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.73 GB/s	Latency 263 15% 263 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	24x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	21x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	18x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	17x
Quadro FX 1700NvidiaBench 1%, 2,013 samples	12x
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples	11x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $129

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16