Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469 4,317 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 81.9 2-Core 154 67% 109 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 321 35% 277 Pts	64-Core 345 21% 345 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M 4,170 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Clevo(1558 1500) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	4.59% Terrible	Lighting 5.23 Reflection 6.35 Parallax 1.75 4% 4.44 fps	MRender 7.05 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 6.61 5% 6.35 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.59% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 300GB-$289 2,154 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10362 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 182 173 135 154 172 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 196 Write 166 Mixed 164 SusWrite 159 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 14.9 61% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 66.4 DQ Mixed 68.2 58% 88 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	52% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 15.9 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 555MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,170 samples	13x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	7x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	6x

SSD
Burst 960GBPatriotBench 75%, 4,793 samples	3x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
9905428-123.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 28%, 500 samples	3x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	2x
JM1333KSN-2G 2x2GBTranscendBench 37%, 154 samples	2x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $34

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16