HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP xw8600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory	0.8 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080505
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 12 '20 at 23:32
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5450 826 User benchmarks, average bench 47% XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 65 1-Core 43.1 2-Core 86 41% 64.7 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 329 30% 250 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1700 2,013 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 049A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.92 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Verbatim SATA-III SSD 256GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0. Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 217 Write 182 Mixed 164 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 29.4 95% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 146 118% 167 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 87GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 121 120 121 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 118 Write 80 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 121 71% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 112%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 6.3 6.2 4.7 5.8 5.5 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	4.18% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 5.5 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 5.6 9% 7.97 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.18% Great: 7%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 383GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 27.7 Write 22.5 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 19.5 30% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 49GB 1,461 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 8192, 8192, 33792 MB Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 6.5 15% 5.13 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.1 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 22%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 826 samples	21x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 324 samples	17x
Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples	12x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	9x
Quadro FX 5600NvidiaBench 6%, 254 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x

SSD
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $145Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	9x
870 EVO 250G 250GBSamsungBench 92%, 167 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
49GBUnknownBench 18%, 1,461 samples	45x
65GBUnknownBench 19%, 1,017 samples	36x
41GBUnknownBench 17%, 2,583 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $145

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16