Monster TULPAR T5 V19.1

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Monster TULPAR T5 V19.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T5 V19.1
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190716
Uptime	6.7 Days
Run Date	May 11 '20 at 14:23
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	15%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 156 63% 105 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 349 35% 287 Pts	64-Core 427 26% 427 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1D05 1065) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	3.01% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 1.92 Parallax 2.47 2% 2.28 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 3.7 Splatting 7.91 5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.01% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 297 289 295 296 296 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 1,108 Write 987 Mixed 758 SusWrite 310 176% 791 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 74.4 4K Mixed 46 133% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 682 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 425 335% 474 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 249%
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB 7,447 User benchmarks, average bench 248% 169GB free Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 897 885 850 861 852 867 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1023 Write 932 Mixed 924 SusWrite 869 211% 937 MB/s	4K Read 45.8 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 45.4 167% 55 MB/s	DQ Read 714 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 476 368% 513 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 316%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	72% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 22.5 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 21.7 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 V19.1 Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V19.1

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	223x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	127x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	96x

SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	33x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	17x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdata $59Bench 213%, 34,063 samples	16x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	89x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	58x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16