Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 96% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 11 '20 at 10:53
Run Duration	300 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 323 User benchmarks, average bench 73% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 199 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 558 60% 478 Pts	64-Core 1,473 91% 1,473 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 450.82 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	119% Outstanding	Lighting 156 Reflection 189 Parallax 172 127% 172 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 184 Splatting 123 116% 144 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 342GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2150 2067 1957 1985 1989 2019 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	329% Outstanding	Read 2,613 Write 2,200 Mixed 1,445 SusWrite 2,028 464% 2,071 MB/s	4K Read 53 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 71.7 241% 84.7 MB/s	DQ Read 636 DQ Write 510 DQ Mixed 581 433% 576 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 329% Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 104GB free Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 392 392 392 393 392 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 467 Write 446 Mixed 354 SusWrite 393 93% 415 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 84.8 4K Mixed 44.3 153% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 350 266% 360 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 9GB free Firmware: 4B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,459 Write 4,068 Mixed 4,125 941% 4,218 MB/s	4K Read 358 4K Write 180 4K Mixed 213 911% 250 MB/s	DQ Read 829 DQ Write 543 DQ Mixed 647 493% 673 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 212GB free Firmware: DXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 219 218 220 220 220 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	78% Very good	Read 429 Write 393 Mixed 334 SusWrite 220 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 60.3 4K Mixed 35.3 120% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 152 135% 202 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 116%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 592GB free Firmware: RVQ0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 258 256 258 258 258 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 430 Write 402 Mixed 368 SusWrite 258 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 38.1 126% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 289 213% 277 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 121%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 626GB free Firmware: RVQ0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 220 218 220 220 220 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	80% Very good	Read 427 Write 405 Mixed 372 SusWrite 220 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 37.8 126% 43.4 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 261 188% 240 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 219 221 221 220 222 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 220 Write 178 Mixed 75.9 SusWrite 218 126% 173 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 197 198 198 197 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 210 Write 133 Mixed 86.3 SusWrite 195 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C9 8x4GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 49.3 MC Write 42.2 MC Mixed 42.7 128% 44.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.6 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 87.5 46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $383

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16