Asrock J4105M

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock J4105M (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180103
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 11 '20 at 00:06
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Memory 46.6 1-Core 50.9 2-Core 102 39% 66.5 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 185 25% 185 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 6438) 3GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1722 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	16.5% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 19.2 Parallax 17.1 15% 18.3 fps	MRender 25.7 Gravity 18.2 Splatting 25.5 19% 23.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D240G 240GB 6,836 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0410A SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 373 382 410 422 422 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Read 459 Write 423 Mixed 410 SusWrite 393 95% 421 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 40.4 134% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 132 140% 229 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 123%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,921 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 3.6 6.1 8.3 8.4 7.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	5.66% Terrible	Read 22.8 Write 25 Mixed 9 SusWrite 6.7 20% 15.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.66% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD 1x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.2% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 9.7 25% 8.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical J4105M Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4105M

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	22x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	14x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	2x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 240GBGigabyte $30Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
M500 120GBCrucial $75Bench 66%, 15,430 samples	2x

RAM
HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GBSK_HynixBench 29%, 7 samples	3x
HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBSK_HynixBench 28%, 2 samples	2x
PSD44G240081 1x4GBPatriotBench 41%, 314 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $30

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16